|
What
is the general situation with land use?
A constant
trend in Prague is a growth of built-up
areas
, particularly at the expense of
agricultural land and so-called other areas, as indicated by
information from the Real Estate Cadastral Register. Between 1990
and 1997, some 0.6 % of Prague´s total area of 49,600 hectares were
affected by such changes; more specifically, the total built-up area
increased from 4,241 hectares to 4,611 hectares (+370 hectares),
while the total agricultural land area shrank from 21,603 hectares
to 21,352 hectares (-251 hectares).
Increments/decrements of aggregate areas of different
land types

Aggregate
areas of land types (in hectares)
|
|
1985
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1997 -
1985 |
|
Agricultural land |
22 316
|
21 469
|
21 419
|
21 364
|
21 341
|
21 344
|
21 330
|
21 352
|
-964
|
|
- Arable land |
16 507
|
15 816
|
15 776
|
15 717
|
15 694
|
15 664
|
15 693
|
15 727
|
-780
|
|
- Vineyards |
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
0
|
|
- Gardens |
4 036
|
4 023
|
4 011
|
4 010
|
4 013
|
4 013
|
4 011
|
4 004
|
-32
|
|
- Orchards |
801
|
739
|
742
|
747
|
747
|
775
|
736
|
729
|
-72
|
|
- Meadows |
605
|
557
|
554
|
554
|
552
|
557
|
554
|
556
|
-49
|
|
- Pastures |
357
|
324
|
326
|
326
|
325
|
325
|
326
|
326
|
-31
|
|
Forest
land |
4 943
|
4 856
|
4 852
|
4 851
|
4 852
|
4 848
|
4 867
|
4 866
|
-77
|
|
Ponds and
lakes |
1 049
|
1 076
|
1 072
|
1 072
|
1 070
|
1 070
|
1 066
|
1 066
|
17
|
|
Built-up
areas and yards |
4 199
|
4 290
|
4 341
|
4 422
|
4 494
|
4 531
|
4 572
|
4 611
|
412
|
|
Other
areas** |
17 135
|
17 922
|
17 929
|
17 904
|
17 855
|
17 819
|
17 783
|
17 745
|
610
|
|
Total
area* |
49 642
|
49 613
|
49 613
|
49 613
|
49 612
|
49 612
|
49 618
|
49 640
|
|
* differences
in totals are due to rounding ** the “Other areas” also include
building sites
Source:
CÚZK
Land lot types,
1997
What is the general situation with forests?
Forests in the territory of Prague
fall into the so-called special purpose category, their function
being predominantly recreational.
Categories of forests
|
Categories of forests |
1996
|
1997
|
|
Timber
production [103 hectares] |
-
|
-
|
|
Protective
[103 hectares] |
-
|
-
|
|
Special-purpose [103 hectares]
|
4.8
|
4.9
|
Source:
ÚHÚL
What is the general situation
with soil?
As to the analyses of the
samples taken on farming land their results were evaluated using the
criteria and limits set forth in Decree No. 13/1993 Coll., on the
protection of agricultural land fund. Insofar as other land is
concerned the analyses were evaluated using the limits laid down in
the Methodological Directive of the Ministry of the Environment of
the Czech Republic on the criteria applying to contaminated soil and
polluted groundwater published in August 1996 (an update of its
previous statement regarding standards and criteria applying to
contaminated soil and polluted groundwater sanitization).
There are three
limits used to assess the soil contamination level:
A
- Type A criteria are more or less consistent with natural
concentrations. Any excess is viewed as an environmental component
pollution case. B - Artificially
introduced criteria, more or less an arithmetic mean of Type A and
Type C criteria. Any excess is viewed as a contamination which may
have an adverse effect on human health and environmental components
and requiring a tentative risk assessment. C - Any
excess of Type C limits may amount to a serious threat to human
health and environmental components. The risk level requires an
assessment.
Fourteen sites
have been monitored on a regular basis since 1981, but there have not been any essential changes in the
concentrations of selected hazardous substances
over the whole period at any of the sites. There are
persistently high concentrations of heavy metals (under Limit B) in Husova, Karlovo námestí,
Smetanovo nábrezí, Nám. 14. ríjna, and also
in Delnická, Rohanský ostrov or Kolbenovo nám.
High mercury levels are typical
for sites in the center of the city. Non-polar extractable
substances occur in concentrations well above Limit A at all the
sites. In Delnická they were found to exceed Limit C, in some other
sites, especially nám. Jirího z Podebrad, Smetanovo nábrezí,
Nám. 14. ríjna, concentrations approach Limit B.
Sites marked as potentially contaminated
areas during the mapping of waste dumps and historical
contamination sites
were selected (Hloubetín, Morušová,
parking garages of Prague Municipal Transport Company, Reinerova,
and Zbraslav Railway Station). Results have
shown that conclusions drawn during the mapping phase were correct.
Especially the topsoil on the premises of the Zbraslav Railway
Station contained high concentrations of heavy metals and NES,
justifying a “contaminated area” rating. A risk analysis would be
recommendable for all the areas under observation.
See information
about historical contamination sites
Monitoring of
soil contamination, concentrations of Pb, Zn, Cd, NEL (non-polar
extractable substances) at regularly monitored sites in
1996
What is the general situation
with biodiversity?
The study in Troja Basin has confirmed a
generally observable trend namely that of the degradation of natural
assemblages caused by anthropogeneous impacts (especially by
airborne pollution) having stopped since 1992, and some indicators even having exihibited a reversal and
revitalization
.
A study of lichens was undertaken for the first
time ever. The survival of just nine epiphytes out of the total
number of 72 lichen species identified there. Bryological data
indicates the disappearance of a number of moss species. In the area under study the process
of short-term revitalization is clearly manifested on assemblages of
molluscs. The findings concerned to
number of butterfly species are regarded as indicative of a
stabilized situation.
(Why?
See pressure on
landscape) The state is influenced by natural conditions
too:
A slight decline
of the number of butterfly species and a considerable drop in their
overall number compared to the previous inventories in 1987 and 1992
result from a long and hard winter, which have had similar
consequences in the whole territory of Bohemia as well as elsewhere
in Europe. The findings are regarded as indicative of a stabilized
situation. The
enrichment of the number of species and the overall number of
phytophagous beetles is attributable mainly to some parts of the
area under study returning to their natural state by developing a
vegetation cover on sections rendered devoid of nature as a result
of fairly recent extensive building projects. As far as ground beetles are
concerned their population has been affected by previous climatic
anomalies. However, the situation is practically the same as in 1992
while there was a pronounced decline between 1987 and 1992 also
related to the turning point of the environmental quality trend
mentioned above in 1990 or so. There is a slight regression observed in herpetofauna
(amphibians). As to frogs it is attributable to a drop of the number
of tadpoles which are consumed by larger fish species. As to lizards
and snakes they are made to leave places that used to be warm and
sunny in the past but now have been developing a thick and tall
vegetation cover. This phenomenon is thus not caused by man-made
effects. An
analysis of the overall numbers and the number of species of mammals
indicates a stabilized assemblage without any bioindication or
otherwise important species consistent with local conditions and
potential.


|